02Case 02 / 04 · Google Cloud

The Watchtower and the Magnifying Glass

A survey and interviews uncovered two very different personas and one thing they both wanted: to be alerted instead of keeping watch. That changed where the product was headed.

OrgGoogle Cloud
ProductCloud Monitoring
RoleProgram lead (team of four researchers)
TeamObservability product teams
TimeframeAbout three months
SampleA survey of experienced Google Cloud customers, plus in-depth interviews with enterprise teams
Methods
M.01Jobs-to-be-done framingM.02Survey (quantitative)M.03In-depth interviews (qualitative)M.04Segmentation by roleM.05Cross-product synthesis

TL;DR

Picture an engineer staring at a wall of dashboards, waiting for something to turn red. For a long time that was the job monitoring tools were built around, and the working assumption was that our biggest customers were pretty happy with it. I led a team of four researchers through a large customer survey and in-depth interviews to find out what people open the tool to do. When we split the results by role, two personas showed up: Infra Operators, who watch everything (the Watchtower), and App Devs, who zoom in on one problem (the Magnifying Glass). They had different jobs and different frustrations, but underneath both was the same shift: nobody wanted to watch dashboards anymore. They wanted the tool to tell them when something needed them. That reframed the strategy around proactive help instead of passive watching, and around making the observability tools feel less like separate products and more like one connected, seamless system.

The big picture

How a satisfaction study became a strategy reset

On average, customers looked mostly happy, but the average was hiding the story. Split by role, the data showed two personas doing very different jobs:

  • The Watchtower (Infra Operators) needs a view of the whole system to keep everything healthy.
  • The Magnifying Glass (App Devs) needs to find the problem in their own code, fast.

What both personas wanted

The two personas experienced the same tools very differently, and a lot of that came down to how much jumping between tools their job required. Underneath, though, they wanted the same thing: less watching, and more of the tool doing the watching for them.

Where the tools fall away

When something broke, the tools were good at telling people something was wrong. The harder part came next, finding the cause, and that’s where confidence dropped. People wanted the path from “something’s off” to “here’s why” to feel like one connected flow, not a tour of several tools.

From finding to strategy

How one assumption became a new direction

01
The assumptionOur biggest customers are happy with the tool.
02
The evidenceA survey for the numbers, interviews for the reasons.
03
Two personasThe Watchtower (Infra Operators) and the Magnifying Glass (App Devs).
04
The shift“Set it and forget it.” Tell me when to look.
05
StrategyProactive help over passive watching.
✓
DirectionObservability tools that feel like one connected system.

What I almost missed

The average looked fine

The first pass looked at all the survey responses together, which is the standard move, and it told a story everyone would have happily accepted: mostly positive, no major issues. I almost presented it that way! Before any readout, though, I check whether the same data tells a different story when I slice it another way. Role wasn’t the obvious cut, but when I tried it, the tidy average fell apart, and the Watchtower and the Magnifying Glass turned out to be having very different experiences with the same product. “Users are happy” was true. It just wouldn’t have given anyone something to act on.

In their words
“I don’t want to stare at this dashboard. I want it to tell me when I need to look.”
Senior Site Reliability Engineer, interview participant

Impact

What changed

Outcome 01A new directionProduct strategy shifted toward proactive, alert-first help.
Outcome 02Shared language“Watchtower” and “Magnifying Glass” caught on in product and design conversations.
Outcome 03One systemSeparate product teams started planning toward a more connected experience.
Outcome 04Engineering followedEngineering priorities shifted to match.